Low Sugar Inscription: Court Orders Nigerian Breweries to Apologise to Customers

0
736

Following the suit presented before an Edo State High Court by a former Vice-Chancellor, Benson Idahosa University (BIU) Benin, Prof. Ernest Izevbigie, against the Nigerian Breweries Plc, over alleged misleading information, “low sugar,” on the can of one of its non-alcoholic drinks, Amstel Malt, the court has ordered the company to apologise to the claimant, and other members of the public for the wrongful inscription.

Justice  Esohe Ikpomwen of Edo State High Court,  recently  directed  the Nigerian Breweries Plc, to apologise to one of its customers, Prof. Ernest Izevbigie, for the wrongful inscription of “low sugar’’ on its product.

Nigerian Breweries Plc logo

Izevbigie, a professor of Biochemistry had sued NB plc through his lawyer, Okonkwo Emmanuel of Henry Idahagbon and Co. (Trinity Chambers).

The claimant  said that a laboratory investigation revealed that the product contained more sugar than the company put on the brand.

He urged the court to order the company to tender a written apology to him as he had been injured by the deception.

Izevbigie also prayed the court to pronounce that the inscription on the product was misleading to the public.

Low Sugar Inscription: Court Orders Nigerian Breweries to Apologise to Customers
Prof. Ernest Izevbigie

Delivering judgment, Ikponmwen, the Chief Judge of the state, ordered the company to tender an unreserved apology to members of the public who might have been lured by the “trade trick’’ of low sugar on the can.

The judge, however, held that evidence before the court showed that the sugar content of Amstel Malt was between the approved 10 per cent and 15 per cent of sugar by the regulatory body.

She said NB should have indicated that the sugar content contained in the product was lower than other beverage non-alcoholic drinks rather than the “low sugar’’ inscription.

Ikponmwen held that while she might not grant the request suggesting that the information was deceitful, she held that it was a trade trick competition taken too far by the firm.

She held that the claimant’s request urging the court to hold that Amstel malt was a normal non-alcoholic drink and not “low sugar’’ succeeded.

“The defendant is ordered to apologise to the claimant and other public consumers in Nigeria for making them to erroneously believe that Amstel malt is low in sugar within 30 days from the date of this judgment,’’ she held.

(NAN)

LEAVE A REPLY