Scientists Caution against Effects of Secondhand Drinking

0
228

The fact that secondhand smoking is dangerous to health is widespread, but not everyone is aware of the effects of secondhand drinking. However, a new research published in the journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs has recently shown that humans experience harm due to the drinking habit of someone else.

The authors of the study explained that similar to how decision makers have addressed the effects of secondhand smoke over the last two decades, society needs to combat the secondhand effects of drinking, calling alcohol’s harm to others “a significant public health issue.”

According to the research, an analysis of U.S. national survey data showed that some 21 percent of women and 23 percent of men, with an estimated 53 million adults, experienced harm because of someone else’s drinking in the last 12 months.

These harms could be threats or harassment, ruined property or vandalism, physical aggression, harms related to driving, financial or family problems. The most common harm was threats or harassment, reported by 16 percent of survey respondents.

Scientists Caution against Effects of Secondhand Drinking

The specific types of harm experienced differed by gender. Women were more likely to report financial and family problems, whereas ruined property, vandalism, and physical aggression were more likely to be reported by men.

READ  FCT agency to sensitise traditional birth attendants on HIV

There is “considerable risk for women from heavy male drinkers in the household and, for men, from drinkers outside their family”, the authors wrote.

Additional factors, including age and the person’s own drinking, were also important. People younger than age 25 had a higher risk of experiencing harm from someone else’s drinking. Further, almost half of men and women who themselves were heavy drinkers said they had been harmed by someone else’s drinking.

Even people who drank but not heavily were at two to three times the risk of harassment, threats, and driving-related harm compared with abstainers.

According to experts, heavy drinking was defined as drinking five bottles or more drinks at a time for men or four or more bottles for women at least monthly.

To conduct the study, researchers led by Madhabika B. Nayak, Ph.D., of the Alcohol Research Group, a programme of the Public Health Institute in Oakland, Calif., analyzed data from two telephone surveys conducted in 2015—the National Alcohol’s Harm to Others Survey and the National Alcohol Survey.

The current research, funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, looked at data from 8,750 respondents age 18 and older and provided support for alcohol control policies, such as taxation and pricing to reduce alcohol’s harm to persons other than the drinker.

READ  WHO Lists Dangers of Tobacco Smoking on World No Tobacco Day 2019

Timothy Naimi, M.D., M.P.H., of the Boston Medical centre in an accompanying commentary explained that “the freedom to drink alcohol must be counter-balanced by the freedom from being afflicted by others’ drinking in ways manifested by homicide, alcohol-related sexual assault, car crashes, domestic abuse, lost household wages, and child neglect”.

Naimi advocated for increased taxes on alcoholic beverages, noting that there is strong evidence that increased alcohol taxes would decrease excessive drinking and reduce the harms to people other than the drinker.

In a second commentary, Sven Andréasson, M.D., of the Karolinska Institutet of Stockholm, Sweden, wrote, in a similar vein, that setting minimum prices for alcohol is important for reducing the harms caused by drinking.

“There is now a growing literature on the effects of national alcohol policies to reduce not only consumption but also some of the secondhand harms from alcohol, notably the effects of price policies on all forms of violence—assaults, sexual violence, partner violence, and violence toward children,” Andréasson writes. “Recent research on the effects of minimum pricing is particularly relevant in this context, where studies in Canada find reductions in violence after the introduction of minimum pricing”.

Nayak agrees that “Control policies, such as alcohol pricing, taxation, reduced availability, and restricting advertising, may be the most effective ways to reduce not only alcohol consumption but also alcohol’s harm to persons other than the drinker,” she said.

READ  How NIPSS Can Help Solve National Problems – Akhimien

 

 

LEAVE A REPLY